Chimpanzee normativity: evidence and objections
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Evidence and Normativity: Reply to Leite
According to one view about the rationality of belief, such rationality is ultimately nothing other than the rationality that one exhibits in taking the means to one’s ends. On this view, epistemic rationality is really a species or special case of instrumental rationality. In particular, epistemic rationality is instrumental rationality in the service of one’s distinctively cognitive or episte...
متن کاملChimpanzee Problem Comprehension : Insufficient Evidence
approximately linear rate to 5.5°C. Control and exposure data were obtained between 3.9° and 5.3°C. A blower (100 ft3/min) provided airflow from above. The airflow, measured below the empty chamber with a hot-wire anemometer (Datametrics Airflow Multimeter Model 800 VTP), was approximately 6 m per minute in the region of the lever and increased to approximately 18 m per minute at the opposite s...
متن کاملInfinitism, finitude and normativity
I evaluate two new objections to an infinitist account of epistemic justification, and conclude that they fail to raise any new problems for infinitism. The new objections are a refined version of the finite-mind objection, which says infinitism demands more than finite minds can muster, and the normativity objection, which says infinitism entails that we are epistemically blameless in holding ...
متن کاملNormativity, Necessity and Tense: A Recipe for Homebaked Normativity
A reductive analysis of a concept decomposes it into more basic constituent parts. Metaethicists today are in almost unanimous agreement that normative language and concepts cannot be reductively analyzed into entirely nonnormative language and concepts. Basic normative concepts are widely thought to be primitive or elemental in our thought, and therefore to admit of no further (reductive) expl...
متن کاملObjections, Rebuttals and Refutations
This paper considers how the terms ‘objection,’ ‘rebuttal,’ ‘attack,’ ‘refutation,’ ‘rebutting defeater’ and ‘undercutting defeater’ (often referred to as rebutters versus undercutters) are used in writings on argumentation and artificial intelligence. The central focus is on the term ‘rebuttal.’ A provisional classification system is proposed that provides a normative structure within which th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Biology & Philosophy
سال: 2020
ISSN: 0169-3867,1572-8404
DOI: 10.1007/s10539-020-09763-1